Saturday, April 4


To understand capitalism, we need to be able to see it. This is difficult. Many people believe we can understand capitalism from our own experiences, which makes sense, considering how powerfully it structures our individual lives. Unfortunately, our own experience is a terrible guide. We see only a tiny part of capitalism at any given moment, and we miss the vast story in time and space in which it is embedded. Understanding capitalism from our own experience is like taking a movie frame and looking at one detail, then trying to deduce the movie’s plot from that particularity. While such a strategy might lead to some insights, even good ones, it is highly unlikely to help us understand the whole. Capitalism as a planetary phenomenon is not graspable from a biographical, local, or even national perspective.

.

Another problem is that most of us live in capitalist societies: We are immersed in capitalism like fish in water. We cannot look at capitalism from a distance. As the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu observed in a different context, “a successful institution is forgotten.” Because capitalism is all around us, we often miss its peculiarities and its radicalism. It is easier to look at the Stone Age, Europe, or Song-era China, because those economic orders are so different from our own that we immediately perceive them as strange and in need of explanation. In the twenty-first century, however, when capitalism looks so normal, it is difficult to fathom that it has a history. All of this makes it hard to see that capitalism is not simply the way that economic life works, and to realize that it makes up a very small part of the totality of economic life over centuries.

To see capitalism, we also need to place it in its proper time frame. Little can be understood from a purely contemporary perspective, from which capitalism can appear natural— an almost universal state of the world, if perhaps with perplexing shifts from West to East. Just as limited is a view from the vantage of geological time, from which the history of capitalism seems like a supernova suddenly bursting onto the scene, leading to explosive growth in productivity, resource use, and human populations but ultimately remaining invisible within that big bang.

Going back to the moment modern industry emerged about 250 years ago would be a more reasonable alternative, yet it would equate capitalism with industry, a problematic choice that leaves out how merchants and the countryside shaped the capitalist revolution. Instead, I have taken a middle- of- the-road time frame, focusing on the past millennium, capitalism’s millennium. In this time frame, capitalism appears neither natural, as a purely contemporary perspective suggests, nor like a supernova, as a geological perspective suggests. Instead, its history becomes visible as the ongoing unfolding of a new economic logic marked by constant contestation. We can observe its historical development: how islands of capital emerged in cities across the world, became connected, changed shape, extended into the hinterlands— and eventually turned into a capitalist civilization.

(Excerpted with permission from Capitalism: A Global History by Sven Beckert, published by Allen Lane; 2025)



Source link

Share.
Leave A Reply

Exit mobile version