Ahmed, participating in a discussion on the UCC Bill, said the government cannot bring in a law which is “violative of the Fundamental Rights“.
He, however, welcomed several provisions in the draft legislation, like fixing the minimum marriageable age and regulations on live-in relationships.
Read more: Ranjeet Kumar Dass elected Assam Assembly Speaker unanimously
The TMC legislator maintained that the clause in the Quran on multiple marriages is “misinterpreted.”
“While I was ready to support the UCC, broad-based discussions were needed on certain issues,” Ahmed said.
Aiming for a common set of laws on a range of personal matters like marriage, divorce, succession and live-in relationships irrespective of religion, the Assam government on Monday tabled a Bill on the Uniform Civil Code, seeking to ban polygamy and make registration of live-in relationships compulsory.The Bill, however, said that it will not be applicable to any person belonging to the Scheduled Tribes residing in Assam.
It proposed several punitive measures, including seven years imprisonment for bigamy or polygamy, and three months in jail for not registering a live-in relationship.
“The government has brought this Bill with malicious intention, and as a mark of protest, I walk out of the House,” Ahmed said.
He claimed that provisions of the UCC, like who a person can marry, violated verses of the Quran.
“The Quran and what is written in it are main, and it should not be violated,” he asserted.
The TMC legislator claimed that the government cannot bring in a law, “violative of the Fundamental Rights with the excuse of leaning on Directive Principles of State Policy”.
Read more: TMC releases first list of candidates ahead of Assam Assembly elections
“Whatever mandate the government may have got, it cannot overwrite the Constitution,” he said.
Ahmed also questioned why tribals were left out of its ambit if the proposed law is to be ‘uniform’.
