A Polish programmer has beaten an OpenAI model in a gruelling 10-hour coding competition, sparking fresh debate about where artificial intelligence fits in skilled work. Przemysaw Debiak, who goes by Psyho online pseudonym, came out on top against OpenAI‘s custom-built model during the AtCoder World Tour Finals 2025 in Tokyo. The result has got people talking about what this means for programming’s future.AtCoder runs one of the world’s most respected competitive programming platforms, attracting elite coders from across the globe. This year’s competition had an unusual twist – for the first time, an AI model called “OpenAIAHC” went head-to-head with 12 of the world’s best human programmers. Debiak, who used to work for OpenAI, ended up winning the whole thing.
A brutally intense competition format
The competition format was brutal. Everyone had to tackle one massive optimisation problem in the Heuristic Contest category; one of the hardest areas in competitive programming. The problem was classified as NP-hard, meaning contestants needed clever, sometimes imperfect approaches to find the best solution they could within 10 hours.This wasn’t just about coding ability. Competitors had to keep their concentration sharp and think strategically whilst battling exhaustion over the marathon session. The organisers made sure it was fair by giving everyone identical hardware – no computational advantages for the AI. Contestants could use any programming language AtCoder supports, but there was a catch: five-minute cooldown periods between submissions. This meant everyone had to think carefully before making their next move.Despite OpenAI’s model having incredible processing power, Debiak’s determination and problem-solving skills won out. His final score hit 1,812,272,558,909 points, beating the AI’s 1,654,675,725,406 by a slim 9.5% margin. The AI still performed brilliantly though, outscoring the other 10 human competitors.
Ex-OpenAI employee’s win was symbolic of something far more important
This wasn’t really about points or algorithms, it was symbolic. Many people saw this competition as representing something much bigger: the ongoing struggle between human creativity and AI’s growing capabilities. As artificial intelligence keeps advancing in medicine, engineering, and countless other fields, this contest became a pivotal moment in discussions about automation and whether humans still have a place in specialist work.The win meant something special for Debiak. Having worked at OpenAI previously, he knew exactly how powerful AI could become in transforming entire industries. Yet his victory showed that human determination, creativity, and mental toughness still count for something, even against advanced AI systems.Debiak posted on social media afterwards: “I’m completely exhausted. … I’m barely alive. Humanity has prevailed (for now!).” The close result highlighted how AI can crunch through vast amounts of data quickly, but still can’t quite match the subtle problem-solving abilities humans bring, especially under intense pressure.
Sam Altman’s acknowledgement and what to expect next
OpenAI handled their narrow defeat well. They congratulated Debiak on social media, writing: “Congrats to the champion for holding us off this time.” Sam Altman, OpenAI’s CEO, also praised Debiak with a simple “Good job psyho” post.Although AI came second, OpenAI saw this as progress in competitive programming AI. But it raises uncomfortable questions about future contests like AtCoder. If AI can already match some of the world’s best human programmers, how long before machines completely take over these events? It’s a worrying thought for anyone who sees these contests as celebrations of human technical achievement.For now, though, humans have held their ground. As AI keeps evolving, the balance between human and machine intelligence gets more delicate. Whilst AI programming abilities are expanding rapidly, this contest proved there are still areas where human creativity and resilience can just about edge out even the most sophisticated AI models.Whether this continues as AI becomes smarter and more autonomous is anyone’s guess, but right now, human ingenuity has had its day. Debiak’s victory wasn’t just about beating a machine – it was about proving that humanity can still adapt and endure, even as technology races ahead at breakneck speed.
