Since the abrogation of Article 370, the political discourse of J&K UT has witnessed a major shift towards peace and development . Recently, many political pundits are in the favour of granting Jammu a full-fledged separate state. While views on the subject vary widely, some proponents also argue that creating a separate state for Kashmir also could offer several potential administrative, political, and socio-economic benefits. Examining these arguments helps illuminate why some believe statehood could be a constructive step toward long-term stability and development.
One of the primary arguments in favour of separate statehood for Kashmir is improved governance. A smaller, more regionally focused state government may be better positioned to address local needs and challenges. Kashmir has distinct geographical, cultural, and economic characteristics that differ from Jammu. A state government dedicated exclusively to the region could design policies tailored to its mountainous terrain, climate conditions, tourism potential, and agricultural patterns. This localized approach may enhance efficiency in public service delivery, infrastructure development, and disaster management.
Another potential benefit lies in political representation and accountability. When governance structures are closer to the people, citizens often feel their voices carry greater weight. Separate statehood could empower local leaders who are deeply familiar with regional concerns and who can respond more directly to public grievances. This may strengthen democratic participation, encourage civic engagement, and foster a stronger sense of ownership among residents over their political future.
Economic development is also frequently cited as a possible advantage. Kashmir possesses significant tourism potential due to its natural beauty, including lakes, valleys, and snow-covered mountains. With focused policy planning, a state government could prioritize tourism infrastructure, eco-tourism initiatives, handicrafts promotion, and horticulture industries such as apple and saffron cultivation. Tailored economic policies might attract investment, generate employment opportunities, and reduce youth unemployment, which has been a persistent concern in the region.
Security and stability form another part of the discussion. Advocates argue that greater political autonomy within the constitutional framework could reduce feelings of alienation among certain segments of the population. If people perceive that their governance is locally controlled and responsive, it may contribute to trust-building between the administration and citizens. Over time, this could support peacebuilding efforts and strengthen social cohesion.
Administrative flexibility is an additional factor. Separate statehood would allow the region to frame laws and development strategies suited to its demographic composition and social fabric. Education policies, cultural preservation initiatives, and language promotion efforts could reflect local heritage more effectively. Protecting cultural identity while remaining within the broader national framework may create a balanced model of integration and autonomy.
Furthermore, enhanced focus on infrastructure could transform connectivity and trade. Improved road networks, rail links, and digital infrastructure are vital for a landlocked, mountainous region. A dedicated state government might prioritize such projects, ensuring better access to healthcare, education, and markets. This could bridge rural-urban gaps and promote inclusive growth.
It is important to note that the topic of Kashmir’s political status is complex and sensitive, involving historical, constitutional, and geopolitical considerations. Supporters of separate statehood emphasize potential administrative efficiency, stronger democratic engagement, economic revitalization, and cultural preservation as key benefits.
Ultimately, any decision regarding governance structures would need to balance regional aspirations with national unity, constitutional provisions, and long-term stability. Thoughtful dialogue, inclusive policymaking, and respect for democratic processes remain essential in shaping the region’s future.
(Author can be reached at: [email protected])
