Taking up a public interest litigation filed by Advocate Vinay Sharma, a bench of Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia and Justice Bipin Chander Negi directed all the respondents to file their replies by May 21.
Also Read: Delhi High Court flags natural justice violation in passport impounding case; restores writ petition
Congress candidate Anurag Sharma was elected unopposed in the lone Rajya Sabha seat in Himachal Pradesh on March 9.
The petition alleged that Sharma was holding contracts with the state government at the time of filing his nomination, rendering him ineligible to contest the election.
Citing Section 9A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, the petitioner argued that if a candidate holds an active contract with the government at the time of nomination, their candidature is deemed invalid.
Also Read: Delhi High Court rejects Lalu Prasad Yadav’s plea to quash CBI FIR in land-for-jobs case
It claimed that seven contracts held by Sharma were active at the time, but the returning officer failed to scrutinise his nomination and accepted it.
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel)

